Usually a mappable lost & found is for a large theme park (or large public complex - even large train stations) - so it would be a mappable node at high zoom levels.
There is a tiny tiny table at my community center that has had the same pencase and scarf for 8 months. But it is a mappable point if I really wanted to. But most of the time the place would be a mappable node - like at Disneyland or an airport, but occasionally it is part of an office, so lost_and_found=yes would be useful for which stationmaster’s office or service counter at the giant station has the lost and found. so amenity=lost &found works well. Tourism is wrong, as it is for non-torust places (most large train stations in Tokyo (which are a block or two long) have a lost and found somewhere. so amenity=lost_and_found + lost_and_found=yes seems good to me, Javbw > On Apr 27, 2015, at 10:15 PM, Florian LAINEZ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > How would you tag a place where all the lost and found items are collected? > Suggestions: > lost_and_found=yes > amenity=lost_and_found > office=lost_and_found > I don't like amenity=lost_and_found because it can't apply to already > existing amenity POI like amenity=post_office. And the fact is that such an > amenity can actually be the place where the lost and found items are > collected. > > It's not really a very popular topic for now ... > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=lost_and_found#values > <http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=lost_and_found#values> > > What do you think? > > > -- > > Florian Lainez > @overflorian <http://twitter.com/overflorian> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
