> On May 1, 2015, at 12:12 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > For those of you mapping campgrounds, what improvements might you want in > rendering? > Keep in mind there's presently no process for voting for main map rendering. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > I think that osm-carto is actually pretty darn close to complete for camp > grounds. > However, to finish up: > Render motorhome water point and dump station ( > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1507 > <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1507>) > Render pitch numbers > Show large campgrounds at a zoom level corresponding to their size ( > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1020 > <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1020> ) . > Separate out the concept of landcover from the concept of a camp site ( > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1485 > <https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1485> ). > Render certain amenities at appropriate zoom levels. For example a camp > ground with flush toilets, fire rings, hiking and swimming nearby: My personal favorite would be rendering pitch numbers/names/identifiers.
However there is no clear de facto standard in the wild nor am agreement to on the tagging list. At least not that I am aware of. Perhaps the chance that it could be rendered in osm-carto will focus our minds. :)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
