On 1 May 2015 at 19:29, Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Tod Fitch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Or with a more proper namespace: >> >> * camp_site=pitch* >> * pitch:drinking_water=no* >> * pitch:picnic_table=yes* >> >> >> The more I think about it, the more I like this example “with a more >> proper namespace”. >> >> Procedurally, how to go forward? Should this be a new proposal page or an >> edit of the old subsection of the old camp_site extended features proposal? >> > > I prefer the above version and would drop 'drinking_' and 'picnic_' as they don't appear to add anything.
> Or > > * camp_site=camp_pitch* > * camp_pitch:drinking_water=no* > * camp_pitch:picnic_table=yes* > * name=2* > * addr:unit=2* > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
