It's under "Tagging", it's mentioned twice, once under "Main tag", once under "Secondary tags"
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:28 AM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/05/2015 3:18 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That proposal has no listings for Australia (possibly www. >> *nationaltrust*.org.au/ ?) and ignores British www.*nationaltrust*. >> org.uk/ ? >> I've no idea how the 'level' is decided .. while it gives some examples, >> it does not look like it has any explanation of how to determine this. >> It is a proposal ... and needs some work? Certainly more explanation. At >> the moment I cannot use the heritage tag. >> > > I thought "level" should correspond to the admin level of the institute > that lists the object. E.g. when it is done on country level -> 2. In > Belgium it is done on regional level (Flanders, Brussels, Wallonia) -> 4. > > regards > > m > > > If taken that way then the British and Australian National Trusts would > level 2. > > If it is not clear (as in very obvious) to me .. then it probably is not > clear to others.... > Stating how the level is determine would be more usefull than the table as > the table will never cover all instances. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
