On 11/05/2015 08:32, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
On Mon, 11 May 2015 00:27:55 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt <[email protected]> wrote:
I think the concern about data consumers in general is far higher on
this tagging list, then among actual data consumers.
Agreed.
For phone data it may be true, but for access tags (note the thread
title) it is certainly not true - it is unlikely that anybody supports
for example access:foot
For my own use I've been doing it for a while, ever since (some) people
started using it:
https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L351
You could argue that prefixing all access tags with "access:" might
"make it easier for mappers", but only if you simultaneously submit
patches for iD, P2, JOSM, Vespucci, et al, _and_ get a general concensus
that the existing accepted values should be mechanically edited. Good
luck with that.
Cheers,
Andy
PS: Not OSM or map related in any way, but sometimes very relevant to
this list:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000018.html
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
