On 11 May 2015 at 21:40, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Neither is documented at wiki but meaning seems clear and synonymous. > > surface=bricks is used 1997 times, surface=brick 541 times. > > surface=bricks is also consistent with plural form of popular > countable surface values - surface=paving_stones and > surface=concrete:plates > > Is there any good reason to avoid changing existing surface=brick to > surface=bricks? > > 1. Is there any good reason for changing 'brick' to 'bricks' ? If that's what you're searching for, look for 'brick', it won't matter if there's ans on the end 2. 'Bricks' clearly describes "bricks" but does 'brick' describe 'brick-like' as in material [brick dust, (bricks dust)]. We are perhaps familiar with brick walls but not bricks wall - raising the question should the pluralising s be removed ? If it's not hurting anyone, leave it alone ? -- Mike. @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - For all your info on Millom and South Copeland via *the area's premier website - * *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, property & pets* T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
