No. If you were to do that you would need a scheme that defines the sequence. If you work with floor names, you need to define a table that assigns levels to names as well. The approach to count is correct and the base shold be that ground level is level 0.
On 25 May 2015 at 01:41, pmailkeey . <[email protected]> wrote: > Any objection if I 'rewrite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level ? > > It seems to have been written with the misconception that floor names are > numbers when they're not. > > A rewrite: > > - Won't affect existing names that appear as numbers. > - Will encourage mappers to use correct names for floors (as found in > the building) rather than attempt to convert them to meaningless numbers. > > > -- > Mike. > @millomweb <https://sites.google.com/site/millomweb/index/introduction> - > For all your info on Millom and South Copeland > via *the area's premier website - * > > *currently unavailable due to ongoing harassment of me, my family, > property & pets* > > T&Cs <https://sites.google.com/site/pmailkeey/e-mail> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
