On 10/06/2015 11:07 AM, Warin wrote:
On 10/06/2015 9:58 AM, Andreas Goss wrote:
Honestly I don't think it's such a good idea to start voting 1 year
later when there wasn't an ongoing discussion.
The reverse of "rush to voting" ?
I see no reason to wait with nothing happening after some time of the
RFC stage. Others may disagree, some say some time for
'experimentation .. ok if you want that, do it in the draft stage.
Comma added for clarity above.
And then I don't understand why you do donation=blood, but then
blood:plasma=, blood:whole= etc. Why not donation:blood=yes?
A person cannot donate blood plasma .. they donate whole blood and the
plasma is separated out later?
So the donation is blood, what gets used from that donation is a later
process, similar to cloths .. some get used as rags others as clothing.
Ok .. I'm wrong there.. you can donate just blood plasma.
Not normal practice here for donations. A normal blood donation is whole
blood.
But maybe in other places they do plasma only?
--------------------------
The key:value over laps greatly with other donation facilities ..
may be amenity=medical_donation would help separate it?
---------------------
Mapping mobile things is generally not done ... and you have no example
for this ...
using opening_hours ... would mean there is a fixed schedule
for example
opening_hours=week 34 Mo-We 09:00-12:00
It would be 'nice' to show such an example on the proposal page.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
