I think we should focus on the shoes, and not on the students and inter-buildings. Maybe there are some international suuchools in Japan where you can walk in shoes, and have an entrance for students. How would you tag that?
You need a tag like access:shoes=no for inter-building passages and/or doors, and access:shoes=locker for entrances where there is a locker on the other side. čet, 11. lip 2015. 12:06 Friedrich Volkmann <[email protected]> je napisao: > On 08.06.2015 08:52, johnw wrote: > > A month or so ago, new entrance=types came up, and I thought I had a > couple > > new values for entrance. I’ve been thinking about them, and had these two > > ideas. > > > > Please comment on both. > > > > > > 1) > > Access=student - access designated for students of a school/facility, > > similar to customers of a shop or visitors of a facility. Does not imply > age > > or gender, though it is used at mostly at K-12 facilities. For use with > > entrance=* or possibly with certain school amenities (Locker rooms, > > bathrooms, bicycle parking). > > Why not a more generic value like access=attendee? This could also be used > for parking places designated for conference, sports or church attendees. > > We are also still missing a value representing a superset of > delivery/guests/employees/customers/students/etc. I mean all that are > involved in the facility in some way. In German speaking countries, many > roads are designated for "Anliegerverkehr" or "Anrainerverkehr", which > means > all persons who intend contact to abutters. This differs from > access=destination, which also includes people who intend to just walk > around, and on the other hand excludes owners driving through. > > > 2) > > entrance=inter-building - an entrance that is designated for only moving > > between buildings in a facility, even if physically accessible from > outside. > > Usually on the ends of an outdoor walkway considered “indoors" because of > > cultural custom rather than physical access restriction (IE: indoor shoes > > required). Not to be used on normal outdoor pathway entrances. > > The term "inter-building" seems too narrow to me. I guess you could also > use > the entrance to have a cigarette, then return to the same building. Some > smoking areas or terraces are not connected to another building at all. > > We could think about some access=* tag like access=checked-in, but this > would get us to mapping processes instead of geographical data. I think > that > specifying one entrance=main is sufficient for everyday needs. Those who > are > familiar with the facility already know which entrance when to use, and > those who are not should head to the main entrance. > > -- > Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ > Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
