On 21/06/2015 3:03 AM, André Pirard wrote:
On 2015-06-20 14:46, Ruben Maes wrote :
After the proposal Donation was rejected, I tried to address the
issues that were raised in a new proposal using
healthcare=blood_donation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Blood_donation_2
You are of course welcome to point out any flaws.
You are also welcome to improve the language if you like: make phrases
more fluent, fix mistakes, etc.
Looks good at first read.
Thanks for taking care of this life-saving service!
Some contributors will recall that facilities, amenities, healthcare
etc. are not map objects but attributes of them, usually a building
of which the tags apply such as address.
For example, blood donation may periodically take place in a school,
giving (for example in one of the possible LST formats):
building=school
addr:street=*
phone=* (that of the school (main tag))
...
building:blood_donation=yes
blood_donation:phone=*
If periodic then the times when blood donation is present would also be needed!
blood_donation:schedule= times, same format as opening-times tag?
That would be more important than a phone number (which might only be manned
during the opening hours/days).
...
The tricky case is when blood donation happens in mobile vehicles.
That recalls us mapping clouds and the horse in the meadow.
There is no suggestion in the proposal to tag either mobile or periodic
facilities.
So the proposal should be judged on the permanent facilities ONLY.
Extending it to cover other things ?
IMO I would not.
A mobile service could be seen as periodic ...
A periodic service may not have a fixed period/schedule ...
I think the fixed facility can be mapped and verified easily.
Mobile and/or scheduled services are much more difficult to map and verify.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
