On 09.07.2015 13:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > are you aware of the key tomb? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tombs
This is just a draft. It should be marked as abandoned, as you have not made an RFC for 4 years. > and historic=tomb This has never been approved. The main tag may be in use, but the tomb=* subtags are not, except for tomb=tombstone (which according to the page is "deprecated", although it does not refer to any decision to deprecate that). > the tag grave=cenotaph that you propose is in contradiction with your > definition. You already pointed that out on 2015-02-05 12:59. There was no answer. One other issue is that grave=yes is supposed to be used as a main tag. It is very uncommon to have "yes" values in a main tag. There should rather be a *=grave main tag with an optional grave=* subtag. No doubt that we need a tag for graves, but it seems to me that both proposals went seriously wrong. -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging