Warin <[email protected]> writes: > On 20/07/2015 1:08 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: >> So perhaps a relation that carries the border tag with two ways as >> members. The relation would have the boundary tags, and also a disputed >> tag of some sort listing the set of countries involved in the dispute. >> Then each member way has a tag of which country (countries really, but >> only those adjacent) thinks that way is the border. We could require >> that the ways making up the relation make up a closed area, >> >> This could get tricky for 3-way or more situations, but it seems >> reasonably straightforward for the described case. > > I'd use the tag > > source= ? > > That does simply state the source of the information... why add another tag > that does the same thing?
It's not about the source (which is how you found out a fact). It's which party is asserting something, whcih is part of the fact. Also, the point is to be machine parseable.
pgpwuB5SWSY4O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
