sent from a phone

> Am 05.08.2015 um 11:25 schrieb johnw <[email protected]>:
> 
> So is there a way to deal with the discrepancy of =footway, =path, and a lack 
> of an explicit =trail option without a new =footway tag? yea. It means more 
> strictly defining footway and path. which people don’t want to do either. 


path is not just (and not always) footway, it is also cycleway and bridleway 
and combined forms of these



> 
> 
> the overlap and ambiguity of =path is very annoying. 



I don't see an actual problem, besides people interpreting different meanings 
into the tag than what is actually documented. The "ambiguity" (or better 
universality) is intentional.


cheers 
Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to