Hello, +1 to Javbw. I'm completely same opinion & feeling of you.
"admin_level=3" is reserved bit for future "state". I guess Japanese community has consensus on it, and AFAIK there was no further discussion had be done. I've took a look on "admin_level=3" edits. Mainly done by him. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/etajin sample. http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/532759 He did many boundary & place & national park edits, including some mistakes. I had contacted him once via changeset comment, but I could not have response. (He can read Japanese, and meybe English.) I'll mention this issue to talk-ja. If you could got response from him, please tell us. Regards, 2015-08-11 22:25 GMT+09:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: > > > > On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:35 PM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From there I'd link to where the Japanese community discusses boundaries > (which might be the wiki, but often is somewhere else). > > > Thanks for the help Andy I'll look over it in the morning. ^^ > > The only "official" thing I have, and where I got the information for the > admin level, is the wiki page I linked to for Japan tagging. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging#Boundary > > Thanks again for the links! > > Javbw > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Satoshi IIDA mail: nyamp...@gmail.com twitter: @nyampire
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
