I think it is also used with historic, not only heritage, e.g. [1] Thus there are at most ca. 3800 more.[2]
regards m. [1] http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/nl/index-nl.html?zoom=17&lat=50.66496&lon=7.24869&layers=B00000000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFTT&select=r3580734 [2] http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#overview On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Joachim <[email protected]> wrote: > The relation type=site proposal [1] has been around for seven years > now. Milliams is the original creator of the draft while Joshdoe > cleaned up the proposal page, added some to the discussion and also > sent out an RFC in 2011 [2]. > > The relation has a bit of troubled history since the original idea - > usage for a typical school - is strongly discouraged now. The RFC > brought up the point that the relation is not needed if the feature > can be represented by a polygon. > > The definition now is: "A way to group features (represented by > nodes/ways/areas/relations) which belong together but cannot be > adequately described by an area/multipolygon. [...] This relation is > understood to group man-made objects. For groups of natural objects > which share the same name see proposed relation Cluster. " > Further changes since the last RFC: > * The key site=* has been deprecated, better use the full tag instead > (e.g. amenity=university). > * The label role has been removed since this is strongly resisted by > cartographers.[3] > * The entrance role has been removed since it did not fit the new > definition. Discussion is ongoing to readd it. > * The perimeter role has been moved to a sub-proposal with new definition. > * Documented usage examples from the wiki have been added. > > I'd like to bring your attention to the proposal. Please visit the > proposal page [1] and add your comments to the discussion. > > Cheers, Joachim (Jojo4u) > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site > [2] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-February/006730.html > [3] > https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/546#issuecomment-45504933 > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
