Ok, I misread "The other direction." I read it as "the width enforcement
on the other side of the bridge" (since two images were linked) and
there I see bollards on both sides of the road to prevent lorries to use
the wrong lane...
John Willis wrote on 08.09.15 12:01:
I use bollards all the time , guardrails too.
If i tagged it as you suggest, we wouldn't need any of the cycle barriers,
pinches, nor chicanes if they happened to be made of poles. we could use
bollards for it all.
The guardrails are there not to contain a car nor block access, they are positioned for
enforcing maxwidth - just as a barrier=height_restriction is not there as a lamp post or
sign. A chicane or pinch point is not a bollard either - a bollard is meant to completely
block access by being in the way. This is a set of "bollards" positioned to do
a different job as a set (like the ones used to make a traffic calming=chicane or a
pinch) - so i feel that a guardrail or bollard would not reflect the item properly in the
database nor be rendered properly either.
Javbw
On Sep 8, 2015, at 6:12 PM, Carl von Einem <[email protected]> wrote:
johnw wrote on 08.09.15 05:38:
(...)
https://goo.gl/maps/8KUw7 The maxwidth is signed and guardrails are
doing the job. This is width limited for the very narrow bridge in the
background.
barrier=guard_rail
maxwidth=2.2
traffic_sign=maxwidth
https://goo.gl/maps/3NT9X The other direction. Poles are used.
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
barrier=bollard
maxwidth=2.2 (should be the same width as above)
motor_vehicle=yes (to be set in this case since bollard implies "no" by default)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
