I'm still having my problems with separate sidewalks if they are attached directly to the street. Most (all) routing engines will make bigger detours to the next intersection instead of simply crossing the street. For example ( https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=51.047343%2C12.797796&point=51.047138%2C12.798085&locale=de-DE&vehicle=foot&weighting=fastest&elevation=true&layer=Omniscale ) And in my opinion it doesn't follow the on-the-ground rule either because there are two separated way while in reality you could easily get from one to the other.
2015-09-24 12:33 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 11:06:28 +0200 > Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>How to tag the > > width of the sidewalks when using the tagging scheme: > > highway=... > > sidewalk=both|left|right > > > > There are few uses of > > sidewalk:width= > > and just a handful of > > width:sidewalk= > > > > Any other ways of tagging without drawing separate ways for sidewalks? > > With so detailed tagging I would simply mark sidewalk as a separate > highway=footway + footway=sidewalk. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
