When editing, JOSM. When consuming, Osmand. Both seem to treat lanes as lanes. I would prefer we kill the legacy and be all-inclusive on lanes of travel, rather than motor vehicle lanes of travel as it does make for a much more comprehensive and coherent tagging syntax rather than working out when a lane isn't a lane but something else.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Hubert <[email protected]> wrote: > I don’t know why. Anyone please correct me if I’m wrong. My guess is, that > it’s a historically grown reason, for OSM (especially all highway related > stuff) has been/ is defined with double-tracked motor vehicles in mind. > > Also, what tools are you talking about? > > > > *From:* Paul Johnson [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 13:40 > *To:* Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > *Subject:* Re: [Tagging] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle > > > > But why? It seems tools aren't expecting lanes tags with more lanes than > in the lanes count. Seems exceptionally arbitrary and very incomplete to > count only lanes that a sedan can use. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
