Richard, you are entirely forgiven. Thanks for your contributions. I had to look up "Golgafrincham B Ark" but unfortunately I can see your point...
Have a good weekend Colin On 2015-10-30 14:55, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > Colin Smale wrote: > >> Is the situation now clear? Is it now (unambiguously) clear to >> (all) mappers how to tag paths? > > No. > >> So you are saying that any discussions on the mailing lists are >> just distractions as the real decisions are taken elsewhere. >> Where would that be then? > > They're not expressly "taken elsewhere". Generally, good practice in OSM - > whether in tagging, development, or whatever - _evolves_ from clued-up > people doing things well, documenting what they do, and others adopting > these practices. Endless tagging debates on this list and the wiki don't > help this process, and often hinder it by replacing this natural selection > process with arbitrary mechanisms such as voting. > > In other words, tagging@ and the wiki are the Golgafrincham B Ark of OSM. > > You'll forgive me for not answering the remainder of the six questions but > it's Friday and I too am now losing the will to live. :| > > Richard > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/More-human-readable-values-for-traffic-signs-tp5857897p5858331.html > Sent from the Tagging mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
