I just noticed that a lot of boundary relations have the lower ranking parts included as members with the "subarea" role. This role is documented here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
But I wonder how it got on this definition page. Was this discussed anywhere? I don't think it's a good idea to add all those lower entities in nested relations (they are already spatially structured, this is redundant and makes the relations more complicated for no good reason). I propose to remove this property from the definition page and move it to the talk page. Comments? Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
