landuse=flowerbed already exists in the wiki. Personally I would just use this but if another tag is to be developed one consideration with regard to using an "landuse" tag is, should it be more widely applicable?
"landuse=ornamental_planting" for example with another tag to describe the type of plant, i.e. flower, shrub, grass etc. would allow it to be used much more widely. Regards Dudley From: jo...@mac.com Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 19:54:56 +0900 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Tagging] Decorative flower fields? (not as a crop?) On Dec 1, 2015, at 5:30 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: 2015-12-01 9:02 GMT+01:00 John Willis <jo...@mac.com>: So landuse=ornamental_flowers is the current value I will propose, as it has no size connotations yes, it has no size connotations, but it is about "ornament"? Or am I misreading this? You keep speaking of "flower fields", so I think this is the tag to go. well, ornamental flowers are flowers that are for display purposes. Flower fields sounds like it is just for flowers in a large field, rather than an area of flowers for all sizes. I liked the suggested value of ornamental_flowers. Do you think there is a need for a landuse=flowerbed and landuse=flower_field? I thought landuse=ornamental flowers would cover both quite well. thoughts? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
