On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:50:37 +0100 Wolfgang Zenker <wolfg...@lyxys.ka.sub.org> wrote:
> * Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> [160107 23:35]: > > My parents house is in a pretty rural part of Arizona and > > distinguishing between tracks and driveways or even residential > > roads can be difficult there. So my initial instinct was to say > > leave the ways in that part of Colorado as tracks as it can be hard > > to tell on the imagery. > > > But looking at the satellite imagery in the area you linked, they > > clearly look like unpaved residential roads and dirt driveways. > > > I’d leave the driveways in but change the tagging to: > > > highway=service > > service=driveway > > surface=unpaved > > access=private > > I would do almost the same, but would leave out the access=private, > as this is difficult to determine from the aerial imagery, and is > implied for service=driveway anyway. I would strongly dispute "implied for service=driveway anyway" - in some cases service=driveway is accessible for everybody, in many cases it is accessible at least for foot traffic. In case of known access=private access it should be tagged explicitly. (I guess that it is one of so many differences between countries/regions - my experience is based mostly on Poland). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
