On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:52:13 +0100 Colin Smale <[email protected]> wrote:
> Indeed, it is filling one hole with another. So how ARE we going to > represent multi-valued attributes from real life in an OSM context? > > I am not detecting much progress on this, just negativity around all > current attempts at doing it. In my experience name, name:en, old_name, alt_name, alt_name:ru etc etc etc were always sufficient. An example where multivalue names are truly necessary would be interesting. In case of ref on highways multivalues are necessary and ; separation is accepted standard (with support among at least some data consumers). In case of surface tag multivalues are evil and not necessary, despite initial impressions. It depends on situation. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
