On 2016년 02월 03일 10:27, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I'd prefer amenity=museum, but I see that putting it under the tourism > key is quite established so it would have to be discussed if a change > would make sense (if it hurts less to do this change one and forever or > if it is better to bear the little pain when putting tourism=museum as > main tag on a museum). > > I would be more explicit with the key names, to avoid situations like > amenity=parking, parking=surface, surface=asphalt ;-) > > amenity (or tourism)=museum > museum_type (or museum_for or museum:topic or ...) = art / railway / > history / war / mathematics / ... > art_form = painting / photography / sculpture / prints / .... > art_genre = still_life / landscape / portrait / religious / .... (if > applicable, many collections will be more diverse, but some might be > specialized) > art_style = expressionism / futurism / impressionism / mannerism / ... > (if applicable)
So we are now at: tourism=museum (nicer would be amenity, but for the sake of not changing too much) museum:topic= art / railway / history / war / mathematics / ... art_form = painting / photography / sculpture / video / .... art_genre = still_life / landscape / portrait / religious / .... (if applicable, many collections will be more diverse, but some might be specialized) art_style = expressionism / futurism / impressionism / mannerism / ... Additionally amenity=contemporary_art_gallery and shop=art That sounds good to me. Maybe we should have a way to add the names of the artist this gallery represents? Are there any objections to this? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
