On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 11:06:34 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder what others think about changing the status of proposals in > draft mode to abandoned in the wiki. Is this something we want > everyone to do after a certain time, or should this be reserved to > the original proponent? Would the situation be different if the > status wasn't draft but proposed? If you think everybody should be > able to abandon other people's proposals, what would be a reasonable > timespan? Does it depend on the actual usage of the proposed tags, > and if yes, what would be a reasonable threshold? > > FWIW, the actual reason for this mail now is this edit, but I'm more > interested to learn about your general considerations: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/childcare2.0&diff=next&oldid=1128997 > > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging Some time ago I set some obviously abandoned proposals to abandoned, I see no reason for "reserved to the original proponent" "what would be a reasonable threshold" - no edits in this or previous year is my typical method to recognise something on internet as dead. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
