https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport#Route
Is version 2? *Regards,* *Hans* On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jo, > > Is there agreement on the forward/backward roles in PT2? By that i mean > completely phasing them out. Or is it still an open discussion? I won't > add them anymore if the point is to phase them out. > > *Regards,* > > *Hans* > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 11:26 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Hans, >> >> The semantics depend on public_transport:version. >> >> If 1 then yes. >> If 2 there should be no forward/backward roles anymore. >> >> Instead you add an ordered sequence of ways that is continuous. >> >> If you want a demo of how to map PT, we can do a hangout. >> >> Also, have a look at this: >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Polyglot/diary/38980#comment35201 >> >> Mapping public transport should become a lot more convenient by the time >> that GSoC project finishes. >> >> Polyglot >> >> 2016-07-11 10:08 GMT+04:00 Hans De Kryger <hans.dekryge...@gmail.com>: >> >>> If i remove the forward/backward tag on a section of a way (part of the >>> bus route) does that signify the bus goes both ways? >>> >>> *Regards,* >>> >>> *Hans* >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
