On 2016-07-19 22:01, Kevin Kenny wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>> Il giorno 19 lug 2016, alle ore 20:41, Colin Smale <[email protected]> 
>>> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> If you need explicit permission, it's access=private, even if there are 
>>> loads of people with that explicit permission.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> that's also what I had written on the imports list, but I think it's maybe 
>> time to rethink this and evaluate if we shouldn't have more possibilities to 
>> differentiate. Surely it is a big difference between a totally private 
>> driveway or industrial site and government land where you need a permission 
>> but everybody will get it almost automatically?
>> 
>> Or another case again in some Italian towns: you need a permission to access 
>> with a motor vehicle, but you will only get it if you live there (still, 
>> these are not pedestrian like streets, they're more like normal roads, and 
>> besides residents psv, taxi and police, and public administration get 
>> permits).
>> 
>> Not everywhere is GB where current access restrictions seem to be sufficient 
>> for describing the situation.
> 
> Thanks, Martin, that's the point I'm trying to make, and it sounds as if I 
> may have convinced you!
> 
> The High Peaks Wilderness is a lot more like a public park than it is like 
> your driveway. Should it be access=private because on the way in, you have to 
> fill out a form and leave it in the letterbox at a place like this [1]? Does 
> that change fundamentally if you have to download a form like this [2] from a 
> website, fill it out, print it, and have one copy on your car's dashboard and 
> one in your person? That sort of regime: "it's open to the public, but you 
> have to ask for permission explicitly, which you'll always get if you're 
> following the rules" is common in backcountry areas of the United States. 
> 
> It's more a mandatory notification scheme than anything else: if I've picked 
> up a High Peaks permit, the rangers know who I am and what my plans are, so 
> they've got an idea where to look if I'm reported missing (which God 
> forbid!). In a few very stressed areas, they start limiting the number of 
> permits and using them for capacity management, but that's the exception, not 
> the rule. When you consider that on my last trip to the High Peaks, I was at 
> times over 30 km from the nearest road and spent four days before my first 
> supply stop, it's understandable that they want some sort of warning what 
> your plans are. Europe has very few places that are that remote.
> 
> It really still has the feel of 'public park with a few formalities.' It's 
> much more like 'public park' than any of the trips that I've done on private 
> land, where I've needed to ask politely, and answers have varied all over the 
> map:
> 
> - "Who the hell are you?" (from a farmer brandishing a shotgun) 
> - "Absolutely not!" 
> - "A day-use membership is $55/year for individuals and $65/year for 
> families" 
> - "Sure, go ahead, but make sure you pack out anything you pack in!" 
> - "Don't go on the south forty, I let the bull out of the barn and he don't 
> like strangers nohow." 
> - (At a small resort, where I was asking to cross their land to get to a 
> route") "So, am I bursting at the seams with paying guests that I can't let 
> you park? Please park over by the barn and don't block the driveways!"
> 
> Instead, I know exactly what to expect and know that permission will not be 
> refused for a trip that follows the rules.

Your examples feel like private land to me. Except for the one with the
bull... 

Maybe this would help me see the distinction: 

How much trouble are you in, if you enter without explicit permission?
Are you (in theory at least) risking a fine? Would it be a criminal or
statutory offence, or a civil wrong against the landowner? Or are there
no sanctions? How likely are you to get caught? If a policeman
challenges you for something, will they ask to see your permit? 

//colin 
  

Links:
------
[1]
https://fortysixupsanddowns.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/roaring-brook-trail-register.jpg
[2] http://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/regions_pdf/newaccessprmt.pdf
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to