I messed up: I thought I checked all the variants mentioned in the article, but I missed the main proposal somehow. As it's used already a couple of 100 times, I'll just adapt the article as you suggest, to reflect the in-use character.
2016-07-21 13:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]>: > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 21 lug 2016, alle ore 10:31, Tom Pfeifer < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > However, as this is just a value for the historic tag, and it is used > 580x already, you could > > check some of these exiting taggings if they follow the same meaning, > and document the value > > as being 'in use'. > > > +1, this is one of the many cases, where back in 2012 wiki user Kstaden > [1] has changed all open proposals (with no activity for some months) to > abandoned, regardless of the tags being in use or not. I'd switch the > proposal to draft or proposed again, ideally issuing an rfc to check > whether there are problems, with the aim to then set it to active. > > > cheers, > Martin > > [1] it was hundreds and it was almost the only thing he did in the osm > wiki: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Kstaden&target=Kstaden > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Joost @ Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
