W dniu 19.07.2016 12:50, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
2016-07-18 22:13 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl>:
It is already used a bit (among other, more popular types):
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/attraction=yes [1]
Thank you for pointing to taginfo, indeed attraction is already used
for individual features of theme parks and playgrounds.
That's why "tourist_attraction" might be a better choice to replace
tourim=attraction. It's not in use currently. Any comments on that?
Why not use simply attraction=yes? Do you suppose it has some other
meaning than we try to describe?
--
"Low, low, low..." [M. Kempa]
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
