Hi Martin, hi Marc, thanks for the response. I suppose another way of looking at it would be to say that the site's existence is verifiable from satellite images. Is there a tag for that? It could always be added to the note tag, but a structured tag may be better. E.g. "visible:bing2012=1" or "verified:bing2012=1".
Alternatively maybe "source=bing' would also be ok? Strictly speaking, bing may not have been the source, as the data may come from a ground survey. But would it be reasonable to add "source=bing" if the structure is visible on bing? I suppose "verified:bing2012" may be clearer, and avoid confusion? Btw. I'm not proposing a new tag, just seeing whether there is an existing tag I can use. Bjoern On 23 August 2016 at 12:57, Marc Zoutendijk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Op 23 aug. 2016, om 13:42 heeft Bjoern Hassler <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > […] > > > However, I'd like to add something like "visibility", indicating whether > the site is clearly visible from a satellite image (and may thus be worth > visiting). > > > > What do you think? What tag should I use? > > Satellite images come in various degrees of resolution and hence the > visibility tag would have to account for that. Because those sites may not > be visible at all on different areal images. > > And “being worth a vist” can easily be set with one of the tourism=* > solutions. > > Marc. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
