Thanks Joost, I'd prefer option one or four. wrt lack of porcelain, the
term "toilet" can also be used to refer to the room where the porcelain
thing is located. So dog_toilet seems quite accurate.
But dog* or pet* ? I do see people traveling with a cat but would be
very surprised if a cat was comfortable using a doggy smelling place. I
cannot image any other pet being very keen either. So rather than your
99% dog use, I'd suggest its 100% dog for practical purposes. Anyone's
experience different ?
David
On 20/01/17 19:36, joost schouppe wrote:
Hi,
There were some previous discussions on how we could tag designated
areas for dogs to urinate/defecate. They are quite common, but
unfortunately there are many different tags going around for lack of
documentation.
I have added a section to an old proposal page with these options
(also links to the previous discussions I know of here). I'm not sure
how we can get the comments here to translate to reducing the proposal
to just one tagging option? Maybe have a pre-vote?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_Poop_Area
Description:
This is an area designated for pets (dogs) urinate and excrete. Unlike
dog_park label, the main objective of the area is not that dogs play.
It is usually small and fenced areas, but can also just be a
designated patch of grass by the side of the road. It is known as
pee-can in some countries.
Joost Schouppe
OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |
Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup
<http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/members/97979802/>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
