> On Feb 6, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > > @Martin: there are two relevant Wikipedia articles: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedlot <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedlot> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated_animal_feeding_operation > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated_animal_feeding_operation> > > @Tod > crop=feed_lot does not seem right. >
I agree. That is simply a place I am familiar with have driven past it numerous times. > Picking up Martin's proposal, what about: > landuse=farmyard > AND > farmyard=feedlot OR farmyard=concentrated_animal_feeding_operation OR > farmyard=CAFO > > Another aproach could be > landuse=farmland > farm:type=feedlot > I think I prefer: landuse=farmyard farmyard=feedlot as it seems more consistent. In my mind, the second key of “farm:type=feedlot” mixes keys and values oddly. If the primary key were “landuse=farm” then it would make more sense to me for a “farm:type” subkey. Looks like “landuse=farmyard” is more used than “landuse=farm” and the farmyard wiki page [1] says “landuse=farm” is not recommended. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
