Hi Warin, Thanks for feedback, still I dont get the meaing of your first sentence, sorry. ad way too big) could you suggest proper partitioning? Its not about new tags, just through explanation of cases for level=* ad level=-1-8) It means -1 to 8. This is already well established and not matter for discussion.
btw, I suggested only modifications to "accepted Simple Indoor Tagging" -- is it ok? Or should I create a complete self-explanatory proposal? Pavel On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:02 AM Warin <[email protected]> wrote: > Err 60 seconds and .. > > Way too big ... as in too many things in the one proposal. > I would break it up into the individual keys. > > The layer=-1-8 .. confusing .. is that -1 to -8 or -1 to 8 ? > > On 08-Feb-17 07:09 PM, Pavel Zbytovský wrote: > > Hello, > > I have some points about indoor mapping. There is already an established > tagging scheme - the Simple Indoor Tagging - but I think it could be > refined a little. Especially it doesn't allow for easy corridors placement, > and also some definitions could be more rigorous. Last year I finished my > thesis on the topic of Indoor mapping and also submited a pull request for > iD editor (see zby.cz/thesis), now I created a proposal to move us little > bit further: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/CoreIndoor > > > I would be glad for comments, and I hope we could make OSM the best indoor > map ever :-) > > Pavel Zbytovský > zby.cz > openstreetmap.cz > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing > [email protected]https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
