Woosh, 200 edits a day! Not saying it's not useful, but at least self-moderation should be considered. After all it's a community there. Yves
Le 10 mars 2017 20:25:17 GMT+01:00, Frederik Ramm <[email protected]> a écrit : >Hi, > >On 03/10/2017 08:05 PM, Mariusz wrote: >> >> Please note that due to recent changes by user Verdy_p the >"designated" >> value for various access key has been apparently marked as >deprecated. >> Pages affected: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated > >The user Verdy_p changes about 200 wiki pages every day, and none of >his >changes are usually discussed before he applies them. I have no idea if >the overall quality is good or bad but there's hardly a day without >someone complaining. > >As far as I can see the change you are referring to is > >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key%3Aaccess&type=revision&diff=1440112&oldid=1439975 > >before that, "access=designated" wasn't even on the "Key:access" page, >and Verdy_p added it there: > >''(disapproved)'' A preferred or designated route for the class of >traffic specified by the tag key, such as {{tag|foot|designated}}. >Using >this value with the plain access key, {{tag|access|designated}}, has no >meaning, and should '''not''' be used. ''(see [[#Transport mode >restrictions]])'' > >On https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated, Verdy_p >added a banner saying "NOTE! The exact key/value combination >access=designated should never appear on an object. The value >*=designated must be used with a specific mode of transport. Examples: >bicycle=designated or foot=designated." - he made this change without >any change comment. > >The user rafmar (you?) seems to have assumed that Verdy_p wanted to >discourage the use of all "designated" values, but to be fair to >Verdy_p, the banner explicitly says you SHOULD use the "designated" >value, just not with the "access" key. > >In my eyes it was not ok for Verdy_p to make sweeping changes like that >under the radar but as I said, he makes SO MANY of them that nobody >even >has the time to discuss them all. > >BUT in this particular case, rafmar's complaint seems to be unfounded >and based on a misunderstanding. > >Bye >Frederik > >-- >Frederik Ramm ## eMail [email protected] ## N49°00'09" >E008°23'33" > >_______________________________________________ >Tagging mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
