Mapping some installations can be dissuaded. The military spring to mind.
Some agricultural activities too attract unwanted attention, stopping
beside some strange crop had the police stopping me later on and asking
all sorts of questions.
Those are things I don't map in detail, just the general thing
(landuse=farmland ... with nothing else, and .. no it was not cannabis).
While you can get the information by survey .. it is not something I'd
make 'public'. Not a question of politics, but people making raids on
the crops.
On 13-Mar-17 01:45 AM, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2017-03-12 15:33, Clifford Snow wrote:
Dave,
I'd be concerned about tagging cannabis grow operation after the new
attorney general's comments. I live in Washington state. Cannabis
shops are well known, but not the grow operation. I assume because
they are regulated by the state that the Feds could find them. But
I'd rather not make it easy if the Feds don't know.
If they are tagged as such in OSM, that information must have come
from some source that is already public...
Let's not allow politics to get in the way of mapping!
//colin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
