On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:21:17AM +0000, ael wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:40:24PM +0100, Richard wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 08:24:35PM +1100, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > when using natural=water + water=pool they would become distinct (though > > adjacent) > > water body from the river/creek which they are part of which is not quite > > right. > > They are part of the river with special properties. > > > > So perhaps > > natural=water + water=river > > + stream_pool=yes > > Good point, but why introduce a new term "stream_pool"? Why not just > pool=yes?
for me pool can mean just too many things, stream_pool isn't even one of the first ones which I would think of. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
