If those two footways make up a reasonable continuing path, that's a good case for using the unmarked crossing tagging schema. It communicates all of the features actually being traversed (footway -> crossing the street -> footway) and is extensible: you can easily add curb and surface information.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 7:35 AM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 14. Jul 2017, at 13:16, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > But what if there are no crossings marked? Do we have to invent > > crossings then ? (e.g. near each junction) > > It is not uncommon to have such a network of sidewalks without > > "zebra"-crossings. > > People are allowed to cross everywhere then. > > > > I wouldn't map the sidewalks as proper footways in this case, but you > could also "connect" them with a relation, e.g. type=area. The footways > inside the block should connect with the road, e.g. here > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=64.08781&mlon=-21.89969#map=19/64.08781/-21.89969w > > cheers, > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging