I agree with Wiktor that we shoud use the access tag bicycle=no when cycling' is prohibited. I agree with Volker that the logical meaning of cycleway=no is that there are no cycle tracks or lanes along a section of highway. This might be useful information in a similar way to sidewalk=no, not useless like building=no landuse=no.
On 19 Jul 2017 8:43 a.m., "Wiktor Niesiobedzki" <[email protected]> wrote: > 2017-07-18 23:32 GMT+02:00 marc marc <[email protected]>: > > Le 18. 07. 17 à 22:55, Wiktor Niesiobedzki a écrit : > >> Can anybody point me to explanation of this tag value? > > > > I would use this tag only whre there is a traffic_sign that forbit > > cycling where it shoul be allowed without this sign > > Why not "bicycle=no" in such situation? > > > > >> Should it's use be discouraged by validators / presets? > >> (at least combinations as highway=cycleway + cycleway=no) > > > > It seems to be an error. > > maybe ask the contributor for the meaning of those tags > > Haven't found recent contribution with cycleway=no. Most of those that > I investigated where ~3-5 years old. > > Cheers, > > Wiktor > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
