Am 2017-09-16 19:19, schrieb Viking:
Thank you for splitting it.
I think it is worth to think about splitting the two proposals in a
different way:
One for adding new keys (like flow_rate, water_source) and the other one
for migrating the fire_hydrant:* keys to something else.
I see two main reasons for it:
1. Migration
According to the huge number of affected nodes (~300k for
fire_hydrant:position=*) [1] I'm afraid that a lot of voters will oppose
the proposal due to
the huge impact of it. In this case we would also not have the well
discussed new tags and need to start a new proposal.
2. The part 2 proposal works only if part is agreed on. At least for
pump and suction_head keys. So a rejected part 1 proposal makes the
second more or less useless.
So I would put the changes from part 2 (pump, suction_head, wrench) in
part 1 and move the whole migration issues from part 1 to part 2
Since we are using colon ( : ) in many tags, I'm wondering if we
should switch back to:
couplings_type -> couplings:type
couplings_diameters -> couplings:diameters
+1
Cheers
Moritz
[1]:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions#Values_to_be_replaced
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
