Hi Ialokim, Am 04.10.2017 um 05:36 schrieb Mikolai-Alexander Gütschow: > I've elaborated a proposal for the route=coach tag according to the > Public Transport Scheme v2 and as already in use in some cases. > > See > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport_v2_Vehicle_Type_%22coach%22 > > > The proposal adds the possibility to differentiate between city bus and > coach routes.
I appreciate your interest in improving the tagging of coach services but I would not use route relations. As pointed out by Colin Smale on the Talk page, I would just use a relation which contains the stops/platforms. If there were no fix assignment between a line and one or multiple platforms on a large bus station, adding the area/node of the bus station to the relation would be better. I don't know which value for the type=* tag should be used instead of type=route because it is no collection of highway segments any more. Best regards Michael -- Per E-Mail kommuniziere ich bevorzugt GPG-verschlüsselt. (Mailinglisten ausgenommen) I prefer GPG encryption of emails. (does not apply on mailing lists)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
