On 05-Oct-17 09:16 PM, Viking wrote:
I really don't understand why so many people oppose this proposal [1] without
ever having participated in the discussions that lasted for months.
We did many efforts to reach this compromise that seems a good solution for
firefighters' needs, and now people are opposing to it whithout understanding
the reasons why we chose this scheme.
I am very saddened.
Alberto
[1]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions
Welcome to the problems of making a proposal get past the 'voting'. My
experience leads me to the following observations;
Part of the problem is that there is a group who do not participate nor read
the tagging group.
These people need each and every point raised on the tagging group fully and
detailed explained why it is this way rather than their way, or the way it is
not or some other way.
And they probably won't look at the discussion page either so it has to be
detailed on the main page for them.
The someone will say they want to see what the proposal will look like as it
would exist on the wiki, and they want the proposal page to look like that.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
