But from the outside tou can't see if the office is in "Gran Via 1 shop 2" or "Gran Via 1 shop 3", despite of the shop number being displayed in the mailbox.
El 27/10/2017 8:03, "Colin Smale" <colin.sm...@xs4all.nl> escribió: > Time for a more philosophical discussion... What is the function of this > thing we call "address"? Is it to identify a premises? Is it to describe a > premises? Does it refer to the whole premises, or just the bit with the > front door or letter box? Or is it "where to deliver post"? > > Here in NL buildings all have unique numbers in a big register, and there > is a n..m mapping between addresses and buildings. Only enclosed > constructions "where a person can stand" are counted as buildings. An > address can include sub-units like "167A" or "23-3" (third floor flat for > example). If there are multiple households or organisations sharing the > same letter box, they have the same address. So you can say the address is > a logical concept, not a physical one. So no problems with having multiple > nodes with the same address if they represent different organisations. > > > //colin > > On 2017-10-27 03:31, Andrew Davidson wrote: > > > > On 27/10/17 11:20, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > > The OSM rule is clear - "One feature, one OSM element". Thus 3 offices, 3 > nodes. > > > So 1 address 1 node (or 1 polygon if you know the spatial extent)? > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
