sent from a phone
> On 3. Dec 2017, at 05:00, Daniel Koć <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > > 1. Discourage leisure=nature_reserve and make it a subtag of > boundary=protected_area (if needed, otherwise just use a protect_class=7 or > other class if known), like: > > - nature_reserve=yes - 2 uses > - protected_area=nature_reserve - 22 uses > - protected_area=nature - 61 uses > > 2. Drop boundary=national_park, since it's easy to identify them all and they > are equivalent for boundary=protected_area + protect_class=2 anyway. I’m against both proposals (for the current situation, but with more changes to the whole system it might change), for 1 it was demonstrated that there are cases of nature reserves which aren’t protected areas according to osm tag definitions and for 2 I believe simple and self explanatory tagging is preferable over more complicated, not human readable, equally detailed alternative tagging cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
