Hi Moritz, 

It depends on what characteristics are important to you. 

"water driven" is power transfer medium so pump:power_medium=water. This
is not the energy source! It doesn't say if the water has
potential/kinetic energy due to gravity, or if it itself is being
pressurised by a powered pump (e.g. hydrostatic drive) 

"integrated" is to distinguish from something else? What would be
alternatives to a pump being "integrated"? 

"bilge pump" is about its function, so something like
"pump:function=bilge" 

"in a well" is about its location so "pump:location=bottom_of_well"?

How about the type of pump? Centrifugal? Reciprocating? 

And the medium that is being pumped? In this context it is probably
water but in general a pump could be used for all sorts of stuff. 

--colin 

On 2017-12-19 17:31, Moritz wrote:

> Hi Colin,
> 
> Am 2017-12-19 16:29, schrieb Colin Smale: 
> 
>> Please don't use "pump:type" as it invites people to use it for loads of
>> different things. You are actually doing it yourself. A "bilge pump" is
>> functional and says nothing about the construction or power source (even
>> if there is such a thing as a typical bilge pump). And "electric_pump"
>> is about the power source, and says nothing about the function or
>> construction.
> 
> What is your suggestion for proper tagging a
> 
> * water driven bilge pump which is integrated in the well
> * an electric pump integrated in the well?
> 
> Moritz
> 
> On 2017-12-19 16:20, François Lacombe wrote:
> 
> Hi Viking,
> 
> Thank you for your work on this additional part
> 
> I'd be in favor of grouping pump et pump:type in on "pump" key. Valid values 
> would be yes, bilge_pump or electric_pum. Yes would be used only if pump 
> technology is unknown.
> 
> There is no need of 2 keys.
> 
> All the best
> 
> François
> 
> FRANÇOIS LACOMBE
> 
> fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com
> www.infos-reseaux.com [1] [3 [1]]
> @InfosReseaux [4 [2]]
> 2017-12-19 10:40 GMT+01:00 Viking <vikin...@tin.it>:
> 
> I removed all "useful combination" on hydrants wiki, because all optional 
> tags could be added to this list and it would become unnecessarily long.
> 
> Best regards
> Alberto
> 
> ---
> Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus [1 [3]]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging [2 [4]] 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Links:
------
[1] https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[2] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[3] http://www.infos-reseaux.com
[4] http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging 

Links:
------
[1] http://www.infos-reseaux.com
[2] http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux
[3] https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[4] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to