Hello, Le 26. 12. 17 à 00:22, Dave F a écrit :
> There's been quite a few recent additions of 'cycleway:both=no' being > added by users of StreetComplete. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8609990 > > There's no mention of this tag on the wiki & to me appears a bit > ambiguous. Most (all?) are the sole cycle tag on the entity. Both=no > suggests that a cycleway could exist in one direction. I agree that cycleway:both=no is not a good tag. cycleway=no is better. > What is the reason the developers aren't using the established tagging > scheme: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway ask the dev :) > Note under 'cycleway=no' as a tag of "dubious usefulness". I could help to see what road have been surveyed and somebody see that this road doesn't have a cycleway. Put in urban area, it's a (minor) added value. Without a cycleway tag, the cycleway is unknown. > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. it's also a dubious usefulness :) Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
