I'd use "normal" or "regular", leaving "raised" for "above the norm". Both values are quite rare, but I guess that is because most will simply not tag it. Or (as the wiki discussion suggests) use kerb:height in cm.
Looks like that wiki page could use updating... Matej Lieskovský On 28 December 2017 at 22:25, Nick Bolten <[email protected]> wrote: > This kind of info is actually very relevant to all kinds of different > pedestrians. There are manual wheelchair users with serious athleticism who > are happy with moderate curbs, but can't do tall ones (due to physics - > they'd tip before getting over), people with limited mobility who use > walkers/canes and can't do large displacements, people using very fancy > (and expensive) electric wheelchairs that can handle relatively high curbs, > etc. If you add kerb:height info, it could be very useful to someone, > eventually! > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 1:07 PM Selfish Seahorse < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 28 December 2017 at 20:29, Martin Koppenhoefer >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I think it makes a difference to many wheelchair users or cyclists or >> automobilists or most other vehicles and pedestrians whether the kerb is 12 >> or 30 centimeters (assuming that meters was a typo, right?). >> > >> > Regarding the tag raised kerb seems ok for both types of kerbs though. >> >> Yes, centimetres. Sorry, this was a mistake. >> >> And I was thinking of pedestrian crossings and that it doesn't make a >> difference there (though, actually, I've never seen a pedestrian >> crossing with a kerb of 30 cm height). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
