On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 6:51 AM, Fernando Trebien < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 1:30 PM, Jo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I fail to understand what information the route role is supposed to add. > > > > Identify "on/off ramp" connections on cycleways and multi-use paths that > > have a "bicycle superhighway" configuration. > > I think you're much more ahead than me on this. Could you provide an > example where the route role would be used for a multi-use path? > > At first glance it seems to make sense to me that ramps would have a > link role (as in road routes), not a route role. I wouldn't use any role on the mainline, except maybe "forward/backward" if it was a route that only applies in one direction or as part of a super-relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/36.14776/-95.97981&layers=C is a good spot to see a few different possibilities. This is where a local cycleway (no number) crosses the proposed Oklahoma state bike route 66 and the proposed US bike route 66. I honestly don't think "link" is a commonly used role at all.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
