2018-01-26 23:34 GMT+01:00 Graeme Fitzpatrick <[email protected]>:
> My thought would be that "public artwork" is, as the wiki suggests, > artwork (be in murals, statues or whatever) in the street, park, shopping > centre or foyer of an open building ie publicly accessible, without payment > of an entry fee. > > By this concept, exhibitions in a museum / gallery won't be public art, so > shouldn't be tagged as such. > > I also agree with this > I would also think that they shouldn't be tagged in OSM at all. If you do, > & the museum holds 1000 pieces, then you will have 1000 tags, rendered > icons & names inside the confines of the building, which will be totally > unworkable! > I wouldn't map what they "hold" (is this including the archive, right?) Typically most of the collections of museums is in the archive, only a tiny fraction is on display in the exhibitions. But I wouldn't mind if people want to map particular pieces of individual artwort (which is on "permanent" display). In an exhibition there is space between the works, so I don't share the fear of having too much information on too few space, even if they are on 2-3 levels rather than one. But I'm for a different key, something "specialist" (i.e. not a key of those of the current mapfeatures), and in particular not "tourism=artwork" which should remain reserved for public art. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
