I map everything as long as it’s waymarked. If a variant is waymarked and named, it belongs to the route. It is the hierarchy I am not sure how to tag exactly. I see type=route in th Netherlands and type=superroute in Germany for the same type of hierarchy, and both seem to display fine on waymarkedtrails. What is a type=superroute needed for then?
Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 7 mei 2018 om 23:48 heeft Warin <[email protected]> het volgende > geschreven: > > Even local hiking routes can have variations in starting and stopping places > as well as route variations to accommodate things. > > I take the view that the 'normal' route is what I map. The different > start/stopping options lie along the route and can be accessed by those using > the route. Just like a bus route or a train route. > > The route variations I'm not certain of. > > In any case .. I try to help the end users .. such as waymarkedtrails .. most > usefull to have the route correctly displayed there. > >> On 08/05/18 04:20, Peter Elderson wrote: >> I've been searching the wiki's for a good description of how to tag long >> hiking routes, particularly compound international routes with separate >> sections per country, where the national section is also a national path on >> its own which in turn consists of several (sometimes many) sections. >> >> Directionality is not a problem with hiking routes, but alternative routes >> and different starting routes are very common and have to be accommodated. >> >> I can found some thoughts about it under "relations", but not a clear and >> definite scheme how to do this. Is there a consensus and if so where can I >> find the thematical documentation? >> >> -- >> Vr gr Peter Elderson >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
