> On May 10, 2018, at 12:03 PM, Ruben Kelevra <ru...@vfn-nrw.de> wrote: > >> 10 May 2018 19:37:11 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: >>> On 10. May 2018, at 19:12, Ruben Kelevra <ru...@vfn-nrw.de> wrote: >>> >>> Well, both tags are combined with a direction tag: >>> >>> direction=forward/backward >> >> >> which is intrinsically flawed, as it gets added to a node but nodes >> don’t have a direction. > Yep. It's a mess and really bad to parse and check for consistency. Also > pretty hard to understand. I fixed many highway=stop nodes which are > actually the intersection nodes, so even the primary_road was > considered to stop there... which makes no sense. > > What do you think about the relation-approach designed by AMDmi3: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Give_way >
There are “four way”/“all way” stops in my area where traffic on the primary road is required to stop. I map those by putting the highway=stop on the junction node. For those where not all the ways are required to stop, I put the highway=stop on the “limit line”. My reading of the wiki a while back implied that was all that was needed. More recently, based on mail list discussions, I have been adding direction=forward/backward on those too. Not sure why a relation is needed for these as it is pretty simply to tag and, I assume, for a data consumer to use the current tagging. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging